8 Comments
User's avatar
Nick's avatar

Id be interested on your thoughts of risk management methodologies like Kelly and Optimal F - if you're familiar.

I'm realising the number of samples/trades one uses can give stark differences in the amounts to risk )shouldn't be much of a surprise!). Any thoughts on what to base the number of samples or look back period on? volatility, business cycle, previous trend,fixed number: 40, 100, 200, or just what we feel at ease with. Other thoughts?

Thanks for any input.

PA - Global Macro's avatar

i will do a deep dive. but i am using 12 units of risk on the overall book, 3 max in a particular theme. So there is some diversification obviously but i don't go crazy. It works for me. The more lookback the better, but again, it also depends on your investment time horizon. If you trade over the next month only, 50-years worth of lookback makes little sense. Don't overcomplicated it and always check whether it makes intuitive sense. Hope that helps.

Nick's avatar

Sure does. As someone said recently:

"Many look at others for answers, whereas the answer is right there inside your own head."

Looking forward to the future deep dive.

Thanks.

SallyGordon's avatar

gratifying-mention Michael on this side of the pond and one receives a blank stare

SallyGordon's avatar

Reviewed this pre-open as this is my weak spot and found it to be informative. I now realize, after open, that I also suffer from premature evacuation. After a short treatise on luck, might you consider another on exits?

SallyGordon's avatar

Addendum: forgot to add I enjoyed Line if Fire and wondered if this might catch your fancy-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOubjLM9Cbc

PA - Global Macro's avatar

of course, absolutely love this tune, listened to it endlessly for hours. Michael was well known in the UK scene. A friend of mine actually signed him for his small label. Then Big little lies happened, the rest is history. Outstanding performer.